Obama’s Legacy: Permanent War and Liberal/Radical Accommodation?

The announcement by the Obama administration that it will seek congressional authorization to expand the war on ISIS in Syria and possibly send more heavy weapons to its client government in Ukraine did not generate the kind of muscular opposition and sense of urgency that one would expect from the anti-interventionist liberals and significant sectors of what use to be the anti-imperialist and anti-war left.

Outside of a few articles written by some of us confined to the marginalized and shrinking left, the reports that the administration was considering both of these courses of action were met with passing indifference. It is as if the capitalist oligarchy’s strategy of permanent war has been accepted as a fait-accompi by the general public and even significant numbers of the left.

The fact that the U.S. President could launch military attacks in Syria, supposedly a sovereign state and member of the United Nations, for six months without any legal justification and not face fierce criticism in the U.S. and internationally demonstrates the embrace of lawlessness that characterizes the current epoch of Western imperialist domination.

And the acquiescence of much of the left in the U.S. and Europe on the issue of Syria and the U.S. supported coup in Ukraine reveals the moderating and accommodating forces within the faux left that attempts to bully and intimidate anti-imperialist critics.

To oppose the dismemberment of Syria or criticize the dangerous collaboration between the U.S. and racist neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine was reduced to the silly and intellectually lazy arguments that one was “pro-Assad” or a dupe for Putin!

However, the current ideological environment did not evolve by accident or by the particular confluence of historical events. The disappearance of anti-imperialism among the cosmopolitan left in the U.S. and Western Europe is reflective of a monumental ideological accomplishment by the propagandists of empire. The professional propagandists of empire and Western dominance were able to adroitly “introject” into the center of the radical world-view and consciousness a liberal ideological framework that privileged “anti-authoritarianism over anti-imperialism.

The political consequence of this shift in consciousness has been disastrous for oppositional left politics throughout the West but particularly in the U.S. As the U.S. increasingly turned to lawless violence to advance its interests over the last seven years of the presidency of Barack Obama, “leftists” in the U.S. objectively aligned themselves with the U.S./EU/NATO axis of domination through their silence or outright support in the name of opposing authoritarian regimes.

The human consequence of this collaboration with U.S. and Western militarization by progressive forces in the U.S. and Europe has translated into unrestrained violent interventions from Libya to Syria and back to Iraq. Along with the escalations of direct military interventions, economic warfare and subversion directed at the state and people of Iran, Russia, Venezuela, and other progressive states in Latin America has resulted in the unnecessary suffering of millions.

And while the left and millions of Europeans will mobilize to condemn the 17 lives lost in the incident in Paris and defend “Western values,” there is no massive moral outrage from the Western public for the millions that have died at the hands of Western imperialism and the death and destruction that is promised with policies being considered for Syria and the Ukraine by the ruling elite in the U.S.

Fortunately, despite the political confusion of many leftists and the moral duplicity of liberals, signs of growing opposition to U.S. war-mongering are emanating from a historically familiar place – African American young people.
Similar to what occurred in the 1960s when opposition to the Vietnam war was catalyzed by the student organizers of the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) working on the frontlines of struggle in the deep South, “Black Lives Matter” activists and the many other formations and tendencies crystalizing out of the Ferguson and anti-police violence movements are making the connection between violence and militarization in the internal colonized areas of the U.S. and the state violence being waged by the U.S. state beyond its’ borders.

Resistance to the logic of white supremacist colonialist/capitalist domination on the part of these young activists is leading them to a resolute anti-imperialist and anti-war stance, just like the young black activists of SNCC some fifty years ago.
Alicia Garza one of the founders of the Black Lives Matter movement offers a welcomed lesson to the faux left:

“There is absolutely a link between the militarization and the use of force to police black communities in the US and the role of the military to police people of color and Black people in the global South. In both scenarios, the police and the military are used to protect private property and the interests of the elite, but are also used to dampen and or eliminate any resistance to the status quo.”
The experiences of these activists in the U.S. and their increasing connections with struggling peoples’ throughout the world is making it clear to them that the slogan “to protect and serve – capital, ” not only applies to the occupation forces that police the racialized colonies inside the U.S. but also the role of the U.S. military abroad.

“Black against empire,” is not only a title to a book; it also captures the radical stance that conscious black radicals in the U.S. must assume.

The systemic degradation that characterizes the social experiences of African American workers, the marginalized poor, and working class of all of the oppressed and colonized nations and peoples’ by the U.S. empire, strips away the pretense of a benevolent hegemon. The lived experience of oppression means that African American radicals – unlike many white radicals – cannot afford the luxury of being unclear about the nature and interests of the white supremacist, patriarchal, colonial/capitalist order. It is and will be the primary enemy.

On Sept. 12, 2001, the day after the attack in New York city and before it was clear what forces were behind the attack, neoconservative pundits revealing the predetermined strategy that was to guide U.S. policy in the 21st century, were forcefully arguing that the U.S. must be prepared to use force in the world and in the immediate period to declare war on “militant Islam.” The counties identified for immediate attack included Syria, Libya, Iraq, and Iran, with China thrown in as well.

Permanent war and lawless gangsterism to protect and advance U.S. global economic and political interests was codified in the National Security Strategy (NSS) issued by President Bush on Sept. 21, 2002.

And while the pursuit of that strategy made President Bush the symbol of U.S. arrogance and generated vociferous liberal and progressive opposition, Barack Obama has faithfully carried out that very same neocon strategy becoming the smiling brown face of U.S. polices as morally repugnant as his predecessor – but without progressive, popular opposition.

The lack of moral outrage and political opposition to the reactionary policies of Barack Obama is changing and will change even more rapidly as the new generation of black activists shift the center of oppositional politics back to the radical black tradition.

When/if that happens, there will be a much needed rebirth of the anti-war and anti-imperialist movement and radical activism in the U.S. will take a qualitative leap forward.



Repression and a green light for murder: The Government “shout out to the Africans out there”!

NFC Champion Seattle Seahawks Team Media AvailabilityObscured by the white noise of the run-up to the Super Bowl, U.S. culture’s 21st century version of the Roman circus, reports began to circulate that despite the massive demonstrations calling for the Federal Department of Justice to render something called “justice” for Mike Brown in the notorious execution case in Ferguson, Missouri, the Justice Department concluded that there was insufficient evidence to bring an indictment against Darren Wilson, the officer who killed Michael Brown. The reports suggest that the Feds are only waiting for the most propitious moment to make the official announcement.

And in New York, Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, an advocate and one of the strongest executioners of the controversial “broken windows” and “stop, question and frisk” policing that many critics argue unfairly targets individuals in poor minority communities, unveiled a plan for a 350 member “Strategic Response Group” to bolster the departments’ “anti-terror” capabilities. Explaining the rationale and mission of the new unit, Bratton said that the unit will be “designed for dealing with events like our recent protests, or incidents like Mumbai or what just happened in Paris.”

With these two decisions, the government position is clear: the security apparatus designed to “protect and serve” capital has been given a green light to repressed and even murder us.

The message for the protectors of the white corporate and financial elite is that it does not matter if you execute a kid in cold blood on front of a dozen witnesses and leave his body in the street for four hours as a message to everyone in the community or you are caught on video murdering Eric Garner or 12 year-old Tamir Rice, you don’t have to fear prosecution from the state. It is now open season when it comes to policing and controlling the dangerous class of poor and working class black people.

What this means for us is that we are the racialized” “other,” the enemy, like the enemies in Iraq and Afghanistan. We also should understand now, if we didn’t before, that even when we mobilize to resist, to demand that “Black lives matter,” that the response from Bratton and the capitalist, racist state could easily result in us and our allies being designated domestic terrorists and thus potential targets for repressive state violence.

Marshawn Lynch’s “shout out to the real Africans” generated days of conversation on the meaning of his statement. We will never know what he meant by that shout out until he clarifies it for us. But until that happens I will take the license to provide my meaning of his statement.

The real Africans that Marshawn refers to are those black people who understand their oppositional relationship to the racist U.S. settler-state. Who understand and embrace the concept that they/we are part of the colonized world and as people from what became known as Africa, we/they are now and should be considered “new Africans” or simply Africans. But more importantly, that as Africans with an oppositional relationship to the U.S. state and its racist, colonialist legacy and history – we must understand that we are at war. That the very nature and structure of the social order is organized to deny us our fundamental human rights and dignity. That when we say that black lives matter, we are not centering white opinion but are positively asserting that black lives matter to us and that we will organize and struggle against all forces that deny us our humanity – all forces- including the U.S. state and its repressive apparatus.

Marshawn might not have had something like that in mind. But in this month in which we remember the 50th anniversary of the assassination of Malcolm X, we must let Bratton, the Department of Justice and all those who continue to deny us our human rights that for many of us “no justice, no peace,” is more than just a slogan we shout at a march, it is a political principle that informs our fight for our fundamental human rights. A principle that we are committed to realizing “by any means necessary.” That must be our shout out!